Search for: "Mukesh Sharma" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2010, 2:53 am
Sharma [2010] EWCA Civ 15 concerned an application to the Court of Appeal by Sharma for permission to appeal a procedural aspect of the High Court's decision in (1) Roger Shashoua (2) Rodemadan Holdings Ltd (3) Stancroft Trust Ltd v Mukesh Sharma [2009] EWHC 957 (Comm) (previously blogged here).Sharma sought permision to appeal for clarification as to whether an anti-suit injunction preventing Sharma from commencing proceedings in India also… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
(1) Roger Shashoua (2) Rodemadan Holdings Ltd (3) Stancroft Trust Ltd v Mukesh Sharma [2009] EWHC 957 (Comm) involved a dispute over a shareholders agreement governed by Indian law, which contained an arbitration clause providing for an arbitration in London, under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC). [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:04 am
Deepak, India—Agricultural Products: Defending India’s First SPS Dispute Adarsh Ramanujan, Atul Sharma & S. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In Roger Shashoua v Mukesh Sharma (2017 (14) SCC 722), where the parties designated Singapore as the venue and did not specify the seat, the Supreme Court concluded that Singapore was the seat of arbitration, despite the contract being a pre-2012 contract (i.e., prior to Balco). [read post]